It is so sad what happened there! Shrek, once a cult figure of cinema history degenerates, becoming a Disney-mainstream heroes. The year was 2001, when "Shrek - Shrek" first flickered on the screens. The premier part of the saga was full of wit, innuendo and the diaphragm tiring dialogues between the green monster and the little, annoying ass. The second part (2004) was able to observe the class of part one, not quite, but it was (mainly because of the appearance Puss the cat) is absolutely worth seeing. A desolate and unnecessary crash is now with "Shrek the Third", which you can just see in theaters. Sadly, trying to become the permanent lot of many characters to make jokes at each other, the individual figures are much too short. The plot (the king of Far Far Away is dying, Shrek must go out to find the heir to the throne) looks quite uncreative, the disputes between Shrek and Donkey disappear in no man's land and the poor cat is also neglected.
Shrek the Third, although by no means disinclined or even boring - it is in fact the makers have succeeded after all, about the course of the film across a few, but for it to put outstanding highlights to recall at least the humor of the first part.
At the end of pretty amusing 90 minutes but then weighs the disappointment over what is offered - and as with so many sequel films, any new strips a little flat. Therefore, I would (my humble opinion will be heard!) Advise against the makers also states that the proposed Part Four (2010) and Five (2013) to actually produce - but ultimately it's probably the revenues that will decide whether I am Shrek continues or nicht.Als conclusion remains for me to say only one thing: I identify with the ass! We stay up all Night to tell us stories of men - and tomorrow morning I'll make us waffles!
0 comments:
Post a Comment